Interview Questions Answers.ORG
Interviewer And Interviewee Guide
Interviews
Quizzes
Home
Quizzes
Interviews Coding/Programming Interviews:Active Template Library (ATL)ActiveXApplication DeveloperArtificial intelligenceAssemblyAssociate Software EngineerAWKAWTC ProgrammingC++ ProgrammingCGI PerlCGI ProgrammingCMMICobolCritical ReasoningData Structures TreesDCOM COMDelphiDTDE4XExtensible Stylesheet Language (XSL)FortranFull-Stack DeveloperHaskellHTML DOMILUIPhone DeveloperJasper Reports DeveloperJava DeveloperLisp ProgrammingLotus NotesMicrosoft Foundation Class (MFC)Mobile DeveloperMVC DeveloperNode.jsOOPPascalPerl ProgrammingPHPPHP DeveloperProgrammingProgramming AlgorithmsProgramming ConceptsPythonRubyRuby on RailsRuby on Rails DeveloperSenior Front End DeveloperSenior Software DeveloperSignature ProgramSOASocket ProgrammingSoftware Development EngineerSoftware engineeringSr. PHP ProgrammerStack And QueueSTLSwift DeveloperTCL (Tool Command Language)Team Leader Android DeveloperUMLUnity 2D Games DeveloperUnity 3D DeveloperUnity DeveloperVBA (Visual Basic for Applications)Visual Basic (VB)Visual C++Web DevelopmentWin32APIWindows ProgramingWordPress DevelopmentWSDLXFormsXHTMLXLinkXMLXPathXQueryXSL-FOXSLT
Copyright © 2018. All Rights Reserved
Haskell Interview Question:
Explain comparison of traditional static languages with Haskell?
Submitted by: AdministratorLanguages that use simple static type systems have been the mainstay of the programming world for decades. Haskell is statically typed, but its notion of what types are for, and what we can do with them, is much more flexible and powerful than traditional languages. Types make a major contribution to the brevity, clarity, and efficiency of Haskell programs.
Although powerful, Haskell's type system is often also unobtrusive. If we omit explicit type information, a Haskell compiler will automatically infer the type of an expression or function. Compared to traditional static languages, to which we must spoon-feed large amounts of type information, the combination of power and inference in Haskell's type system significantly reduces the clutter and redundancy of our code.
Submitted by: Administrator
Although powerful, Haskell's type system is often also unobtrusive. If we omit explicit type information, a Haskell compiler will automatically infer the type of an expression or function. Compared to traditional static languages, to which we must spoon-feed large amounts of type information, the combination of power and inference in Haskell's type system significantly reduces the clutter and redundancy of our code.
Submitted by: Administrator
Copyright 2007-2024 by Interview Questions Answers .ORG All Rights Reserved.
https://InterviewQuestionsAnswers.ORG.
https://InterviewQuestionsAnswers.ORG.