Interview Questions Answers.ORG
Interviewer And Interviewee Guide
Interviews
Quizzes
Home
Quizzes
Interviews Databases Programming Interviews:BtrieveClipperData ModelingData StructuresDatabase AdministrationDatabase Administrator (DBA)Database AnalystDatabase DeveloperDB DevelopmentEDI/Data Integration ExpertFirebirdHierarchicalIBM DB2InformixJava DatabaseMariaDBMicrosoft Access DeveloperMongoDBMS SQL ServerMySQL ProgrammingNetworkNoSQLObject RelationalPostgrePostgreSQLProgressRDBMSRelationalSQLSQL AdministratorSQL and PL/SQLSQL Notification ServicesSQL server 2008SSRSStored ProcedureSybaseTeradata
Copyright © 2018. All Rights Reserved
MariaDB Interview Question:
Tell us why Is Order By In A From Subquery Ignored?
Submitted by: MuhammadA query such as
SELECT field1, field2 FROM ( SELECT field1, field2 FROM table1 ORDER BY field2 ) alias
returns a result set that is not necessarily ordered by field2. This is not a bug.
A "table" (and subquery in the FROM clause too) is - according to the SQL standard - an unordered set of rows. Rows in a table (or in a subquery in the FROM clause) do not come in any specific order. That's why the optimizer can ignore the ORDER BY clause that you have specified. In fact, SQL standard does not even allow the ORDER BY clause to appear in this subquery (we allow it, because ORDER BY ... LIMIT ... changes the result, the set of rows, not only their order).
You need to treat the subquery in the FROM clause, as a set of rows in some unspecified and undefined order, and put the ORDER BY on the top-level SELECT.
Submitted by: Muhammad
SELECT field1, field2 FROM ( SELECT field1, field2 FROM table1 ORDER BY field2 ) alias
returns a result set that is not necessarily ordered by field2. This is not a bug.
A "table" (and subquery in the FROM clause too) is - according to the SQL standard - an unordered set of rows. Rows in a table (or in a subquery in the FROM clause) do not come in any specific order. That's why the optimizer can ignore the ORDER BY clause that you have specified. In fact, SQL standard does not even allow the ORDER BY clause to appear in this subquery (we allow it, because ORDER BY ... LIMIT ... changes the result, the set of rows, not only their order).
You need to treat the subquery in the FROM clause, as a set of rows in some unspecified and undefined order, and put the ORDER BY on the top-level SELECT.
Submitted by: Muhammad
Copyright 2007-2024 by Interview Questions Answers .ORG All Rights Reserved.
https://InterviewQuestionsAnswers.ORG.
https://InterviewQuestionsAnswers.ORG.