Basically yes if you plan to develop new AJAX functionality for your web application.
Not necessarily. Ajax gives interaction designers more flexibility. However, the more power we have, the more caution we must use in exercising it. We must be careful to use Ajax to enhance the user experience of our applications, not degrade it.
Neither Adaptive Path nor Google invented Ajax. Google's recent products are simply the highest-profile examples of Ajax applications. Adaptive Path was not involved in the development of Google's Ajax applications, but we have been doing Ajax work for some of our other clients.
This is working code, it might help you.
xmldoc = req.responseXML;
//IE does not take the responseXML as.
See http://ajax.schwarz-interactive.de/ for a free AJAX implementation for the .NET Framework
The nature of updating a page dynamically using data retrieved via AJAX interactions and DHTML may result in drastically changing the appearance and state of a page. A user might choose to use the browser's back or forward buttons, bookmark a page, copy the URL from the URL bar and share it with a friend via an email or chat client, or print a page at any given time. When designing an AJAX based application you need to consider what the expected behavior would be in the case of navigation, bookmarking, printing, and browser support as described below.
* Bookmarking and URL sharing - Many users want to bookmark or cut and paste the URL from the browser bar. Dojo provides client-side for bookmarking and URL manipulation.
* Printing - In some cases printing dynamically rendered pages can be problematic.
Other considerations as a developer when using AJAX are:
* Browser Support - Not all AJAX/DHTML features are supported on all browsers or all versions of a browser. See quirksmode.org for a list of browser support and possible workarounds.
You need to be careful not to expose your application model in such as way that your server-side components are at risk if a nefarious user to reverse engineer your application. As with any other web application, consider using HTTPS to secure the connection when confidential information is being exchanged.
are several browser-side frameworks available, each with their own uniqueness
Not at all. Macromedia is an Adaptive Path client, and we've long been supporters of Flash technology. As Ajax matures, we expect that sometimes Ajax will be the better solution to a particular problem, and sometimes Flash will be the better solution. We're also interested in exploring ways the technologies can be mixed (as in the case of Flicker, which uses both).